12 min read
Lesson 3 of 5
Transparency, Explainability & Safety
From the course Responsible AI Auditing
Beyond fairness, AI audits must assess whether systems are transparent, explainable, and safe.
Explainability Assessment
Evaluating how well AI decisions can be understood:
- Global Explanations — how does the model work overall? (feature importance, decision rules)
- Local Explanations — why did the model make THIS specific decision?
- Counterfactual Explanations — what would need to change to get a different outcome?
- Explanation Quality — are explanations faithful, stable, and understandable?
Explainability Tools
- SHAP — game-theoretic feature attribution values
- LIME — local interpretable model-agnostic explanations
- InterpretML — Microsoft's interpretable ML library
- Captum — PyTorch model interpretability library
- ELI5 — simple explanations for scikit-learn models
Safety Testing
Ensuring AI systems don't cause harm:
- Red Teaming — adversarial testing to find harmful outputs and failure modes
- Stress Testing — evaluate performance under extreme or unusual inputs
- Edge Case Analysis — test behavior on unusual but possible inputs
- Robustness Testing — evaluate sensitivity to small input perturbations
- Failure Mode Analysis — systematically identify how and when the system fails
LLM-Specific Safety
Large language models require specialized safety assessment:
- Harmful Content Generation — test for violence, illegal activity, and dangerous information
- Bias & Stereotypes — evaluate outputs for social biases and stereotyping
- Hallucination Rate — measure frequency of factually incorrect claims
- Jailbreak Resistance — test prompt injection and system prompt extraction
- Privacy Leakage — check for memorized training data exposure
Documentation Standards
Proper documentation is essential for auditing:
- Model Cards — standardized model documentation including intended use and limitations
- Datasheets for Datasets — documenting data collection, composition, and preprocessing
- System Cards — documenting entire AI systems, not just individual models
- Impact Assessments — documenting potential societal impacts and mitigations
- Audit Reports — structured findings, evidence, and recommendations
Key Takeaways
- •Explainability assessment covers global, local, and counterfactual explanations
- •SHAP and LIME are the most widely used explainability tools
- •Safety testing includes red teaming, stress testing, and failure mode analysis
- •LLM safety requires testing for harmful content, bias, hallucination, and jailbreaks
- •Model Cards and Datasheets provide standardized documentation for auditing
0 of 5 lessons marked complete
Progress is kept in this browser only.