AI Model Wiki

    Skip to main content
    15 min read
    Lesson 3 of 6

    Building Custom Evaluation Pipelines

    From the course Evaluating & Benchmarking AI Models

    Standard benchmarks tell you about general capabilities. Custom evaluations tell you whether a model works for your specific use case.

    Designing Your Eval Suite

    1. Define success criteria: What does a "good" output look like for your task? Be specific.
    2. Collect test cases: 50-200 representative examples covering edge cases and common scenarios.
    3. Create golden answers: Expert-written reference outputs for comparison.
    4. Choose metrics: Select metrics that align with your success criteria.
    5. Automate: Make evaluation runnable with a single command.

    Metric Categories

    Exact match metrics (deterministic):

    • Accuracy, F1, precision, recall for classification
    • Exact match (EM) for extraction tasks
    • Code execution pass rate (compile + run + test)

    Similarity metrics (fuzzy):

    • BLEU, ROUGE for text generation
    • BERTScore for semantic similarity
    • Edit distance for structured outputs

    LLM-as-Judge (flexible):

    • Use a strong model (GPT-4, Claude) to evaluate outputs against criteria
    • Provide clear rubrics with scoring guidelines
    • Use pairwise comparison ("Which response is better?") for more reliable judgments

    LLM-as-Judge Template

    You are evaluating an AI assistant's response. Score from 1-5 on each criterion:
    
    **Accuracy** (1-5): Are all facts correct? Any hallucinations?
    **Completeness** (1-5): Does it address all parts of the question?
    **Clarity** (1-5): Is it well-organized and easy to understand?
    **Helpfulness** (1-5): Would this actually help the user?
    
    Question: {question}
    Reference answer: {reference}
    Model response: {response}
    
    Provide scores and brief justification for each.
    

    Running Evals at Scale

    Use frameworks like:

    • OpenAI Evals: Open-source evaluation framework
    • RAGAS: Specialized for RAG pipeline evaluation
    • DeepEval: Pytest-like framework for LLM evaluation
    • Promptfoo: CLI tool for comparing prompts across models

    CI/CD Integration

    Run evals on every prompt or model change:

    1. Define minimum quality thresholds (e.g., accuracy > 85%)
    2. Run evals in CI pipeline on each commit
    3. Block deployment if quality drops below thresholds
    4. Track metrics over time in a dashboard

    Key Takeaways

    • •Custom evals with 50-200 representative examples are essential for production applications
    • •LLM-as-judge with clear rubrics provides flexible, scalable evaluation
    • •Pairwise comparison is more reliable than absolute scoring for LLM judges
    • •Integrate evals into CI/CD to catch quality regressions before deployment
    0 of 6 lessons marked complete

    Progress is kept in this browser only.