15 min read
Lesson 3 of 6
Building Custom Evaluation Pipelines
From the course Evaluating & Benchmarking AI Models
Standard benchmarks tell you about general capabilities. Custom evaluations tell you whether a model works for your specific use case.
Designing Your Eval Suite
- Define success criteria: What does a "good" output look like for your task? Be specific.
- Collect test cases: 50-200 representative examples covering edge cases and common scenarios.
- Create golden answers: Expert-written reference outputs for comparison.
- Choose metrics: Select metrics that align with your success criteria.
- Automate: Make evaluation runnable with a single command.
Metric Categories
Exact match metrics (deterministic):
- Accuracy, F1, precision, recall for classification
- Exact match (EM) for extraction tasks
- Code execution pass rate (compile + run + test)
Similarity metrics (fuzzy):
- BLEU, ROUGE for text generation
- BERTScore for semantic similarity
- Edit distance for structured outputs
LLM-as-Judge (flexible):
- Use a strong model (GPT-4, Claude) to evaluate outputs against criteria
- Provide clear rubrics with scoring guidelines
- Use pairwise comparison ("Which response is better?") for more reliable judgments
LLM-as-Judge Template
You are evaluating an AI assistant's response. Score from 1-5 on each criterion:
**Accuracy** (1-5): Are all facts correct? Any hallucinations?
**Completeness** (1-5): Does it address all parts of the question?
**Clarity** (1-5): Is it well-organized and easy to understand?
**Helpfulness** (1-5): Would this actually help the user?
Question: {question}
Reference answer: {reference}
Model response: {response}
Provide scores and brief justification for each.
Running Evals at Scale
Use frameworks like:
- OpenAI Evals: Open-source evaluation framework
- RAGAS: Specialized for RAG pipeline evaluation
- DeepEval: Pytest-like framework for LLM evaluation
- Promptfoo: CLI tool for comparing prompts across models
CI/CD Integration
Run evals on every prompt or model change:
- Define minimum quality thresholds (e.g., accuracy > 85%)
- Run evals in CI pipeline on each commit
- Block deployment if quality drops below thresholds
- Track metrics over time in a dashboard
Key Takeaways
- •Custom evals with 50-200 representative examples are essential for production applications
- •LLM-as-judge with clear rubrics provides flexible, scalable evaluation
- •Pairwise comparison is more reliable than absolute scoring for LLM judges
- •Integrate evals into CI/CD to catch quality regressions before deployment
0 of 6 lessons marked complete
Progress is kept in this browser only.